Skip to main content

Baylor Massacre

September 27, 1778

After 4 days of assisting the local militia in driving cattle out of reach of British foragers, Colonel george Baylor moved his troops north and located quarters for them throughout barns and homesteads in what is now River Vale, NJ near Tappan. To keep their position secure in such proximity to the enemy, Colonel Baylor positioned 12 men on the only bridge across the river, so as to provide sufficient alarm of an approaching enemy. According to Blauvelt tradition, this guard near the bridge was stationed at the Cornelius Blauvelt farm just above the bridge with the officers stationed in the house itself. The Blauvelts recalled later that the men positioned on the bridge left their positions early on the evening of the massacre to rejoin their companions in the barn saying that it was useless for them to keep watch as the night was so dark that the enemy could never find their way about. The captain upon hearing this ordered them back to their posts only to have them return a short time later with the same arguements. (The return of the patrols may not reflect any dereliction of duty, but only that the patrols were relieved on regular basis)

Meanwhile, waiting for the cover of darkness, a regiment of British Dragoons under command of Major-General Charles Grey began to head toward the bridge. Using a pincer move with the other end of the point under command of Lord Cornwallis himself, they surrounded the Blauvelt farm using intel gathered from local tories. At one or two in the morning of the 28th, the British efectively cut off the militia from the main body of the force and proceded to kill or take the guard without giving any alarm to the rest of the troops quartered at farms nearby. The guard was attacked with bayonets, with only one American managing to escape. The officers inside were captured without injury. Five soldiers in the barn were injured mortally and were buried under a large tree near the site the next day. Many more soldiers were bayoneted even though they asked for quarters.

In the end 17 were wounded, 5 dead, 33 taken prisoner and 8 of those wounded. But, why would I relate this story? Sure it happened on a Blauvelt farm, but there is a dark side to this story. In 1776 Cornelius Blauvelt was listed as a 1st Lieutenant in the Bergen Militia but he was neither attacked or taken prisoner on that night with not a single cents worth of property plundered dispite the fact that American officers werer found quartered there. The initial encounter between Blauvelt and General Grey sounds like an exchange of passwords. When the British entered the house and asked who Blauvelt was he replied, "I am a man for my country and will fight for it til I die." General Grey replied that he was was also a man for his country," and complimented Blauvelt on his patriotism. Many years later an attempt of Cornelius Blauvelt's was life was made but he managed to escape.

The troops who committed this coutrage to the Americans were some time afterwards captured by a body of American soldiers and were all either shot or put to the sword. When the British captives cried for quarter they were met with jeers and shouts of "Remember Old Tappan!"

There were many Blauvelts involved in the Revolutionary War on both sides. Captain Abraham Blauvelt, Cornelius' older brother, was captured that fateful night and bayoneted while Cornelius's younger brother Theunis, who was a loyalist, eventually moved to Nova Scotia at the War's end.

More information can be found (wikipedia) and here. I've just touched the main points relevant to me but there is much more to the story. So was Cornelius and double crosser or not? How could he do that to his own brother? Facts from History left unanswered make for some of the best storylines for books.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

de Vries, Hans de Vries. Almost.

In 1967 THE James Bond (Sean Connery) decided to step away from the world of James Bond films. EOS studios thus had to find a replacement. It came down to 5 men. 2 Brits, an American, a Australian, and a Dutchman. John Richardson, Anthony Rogers, Robert Campbell, George Lazenby, and Hans de Vries. None of those names ring a bell? George Lazenby won the part for the 6th Bond film, On Her Majesty's Secret Service. A movie that has been lauded both as the worst and one of the best Bond films in the franchise. If you haven't seen it, you should. It was the Bond film that 'Breaks the Fourth Wall', Bond gets married, wears a kilt, and goes skiing. But the reason for this post is instead of this; (Yes, THAT is James Bond) We could of had this. Improvement? Probably not. He looks a wee bit angry. Plus, no one watches OHMSS anyway. So, did de Vries have a movie career after Bond? Ha, no. The only notable movie rolls I can find for him were pre bond. And that was ...

Comment Reply - Protestants

So I've been called out. I had my first comment yesterday stating that during their fight for independence in the Netherlands, Protestants were under oppression in England. I love reading about history but am no History major myself or professional so I appriciate the comment. I remember that happening but I focus on items that interest me. Which is why I've focused on the Netherlands area. So I guess I'll go into it a little more. The Netherlands have always been a very open and free society to live. Think Amsterdam today. In a way I guess you could compare it to Las Vegas or New Orleans. So I have no doubt that some Protestants moved to the Netherlands to escape the oppression and help fuel the independence. People or all walks of life, races, and religions were welcomed. This accepting attitude helped to fuel the competition between England and the Dutch in the 17 and 18th centuries as they raced to gain a trade monopoly over each other. This ties in nice with why I'...

Ray - Forest Boy

Remember around a month ago when the news story hit about Ray the Forest Boy who randomly showed up one day in Berlin, Germany? Well I forgot to post this but it has been found out who Ray the 'Forest Boy' actually is. 20 yr old Robin van Helsum of Hengelo Netherlands (100 miles east of Amsterdam). What allowed the police to finally determine who 'Ray' was? His stepmother. She recognized his picture on the news. He went missing 9 months ago. Now that he has been exposed as a hoax and not the Forest Boy who had been living in the woods for 5 years; Robin may face stiff fines and penalties for the extra police time and work put into his case which could cost as much as $40,000. 'Ray' originally walked into Berlin claiming he had been walking for 5 days after spending 5 years living out of a tent in the 'wild' where he had buried his father. One Berlin police officer said that there were things right from the start that did not match to his story. Lik...