Skip to main content

Paper Conclusion


Dutch as it stands from a 2005 study is the native language of over 22 million people who reside mostly in the Netherlands and Belgium. (Sijs 348) Dutch as a language in America today is diminishing. (Sijs 107) It looks as if the Dutch language is losing ground it would seem. Apparently one can be proud of one’s Dutch background without being able to speak the Dutch language. A personal anecdote proves this the case. My last name is Dutch and I’m proud of it. Blauvelt means Blue Field in Dutch. I am the 13th generation living in America since my first ancestor from Holland made the trek to America. I don’t speak Dutch however, I have been trying. I meet a girl whose last name was van Crae (Americanized) and she asked what percentage Dutch I was. I have no idea, probably very small if any. Her father is from Holland, making her 50%. This proves Sijs’ theory. I am proud to be ‘Dutch’ even though I don’t speak it, have never visited, and by now am most likely more a mix of other nationalities than just one. But my last name is Dutch and that is the culture I most associate myself with.
Of the words that American English adopted form Dutch immigrants over 70% came from the first wave of settlers meaning the loanwords from the 17th and 18th centuries have the upper hand on the more recent words since they have had the longest time to influence us and got here first. Most Dutch loanwords are still known in American English although some only regionally. Also a number of general phonetic changes that Dutch loanwords underwent in American English are interesting to note. Dutch ‘a’ frequently became an ‘o’ which may be due to pronunciation during the 17th century. This affected words like boss, woffle iron etc. (Sijs 280)
The original colonies were not all English and the multiethnic makeup of the Manhattan colony of New Amsterdam proves this point. The national myth dismisses the Dutch presence as irrelevant. That it was small and short lived and inconsequential. That wasn’t us but a collection of ‘alien’ peoples who only left traces. This is all false. The colony was hardly small and it encompassed parts of five of the eventual 13 colonies. In terms of historical evidence, there is a growing mountain of it thanks to the translation and restoration works now going on to revitalize our heritage. The Dutch didn’t go anywhere after the colony was turned over to the British and in fact they kept coming making New York a unique spot on the globe. The only port city plugged directly into both of the world’s two major trading empires. American and Britain. (Shorto 300)
So why is it important to know where our language comes from? Should immigrants leave their old ethnicities behind or preserve them and remain in some way apart from the main culture? What is an American? Or for that matter who is English? The strength in the mixing of cultures idea was undeniable for a long time and the essence of it, this idea of tolerance, matters more now than ever. Tolerance remains a thing of power. (Shorto 318) It’s important to remember where WE came from. Language is us. How you speak, what you speak defines you as a person. As Romaine stated in her book; what we speak can tell you a lot about the person (right or wrong). Social class, gender, ethnicity, etc. Knowing where our language comes from better helps us to see where we fit. Who we are. Helps us make a decision on if that is the person we want to be. It should give us a sense of pride; of community, belonging to something bigger and older. I’m going to go have a koekje now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

de Vries, Hans de Vries. Almost.

In 1967 THE James Bond (Sean Connery) decided to step away from the world of James Bond films. EOS studios thus had to find a replacement. It came down to 5 men. 2 Brits, an American, a Australian, and a Dutchman. John Richardson, Anthony Rogers, Robert Campbell, George Lazenby, and Hans de Vries. None of those names ring a bell? George Lazenby won the part for the 6th Bond film, On Her Majesty's Secret Service. A movie that has been lauded both as the worst and one of the best Bond films in the franchise. If you haven't seen it, you should. It was the Bond film that 'Breaks the Fourth Wall', Bond gets married, wears a kilt, and goes skiing. But the reason for this post is instead of this; (Yes, THAT is James Bond) We could of had this. Improvement? Probably not. He looks a wee bit angry. Plus, no one watches OHMSS anyway. So, did de Vries have a movie career after Bond? Ha, no. The only notable movie rolls I can find for him were pre bond. And that was ...

Dutch Actors - Rutger Hauer

I had a case of 'Hey, I know that guy" the other day. I found another actor who is Dutch, who knew. Rutger Hauer Born in Breukelen, Netherlands 1944. (Yes that is where Brooklyn in New York got it's name from, I think I should post about that more some other time). I posted the picture of him that made me say "oh that guy". Anyone guess what movie the above picture is from? Anyone? Batman Begins, He played Mr Earle. The 'corrupt' businessman CEO leading Wayne Enterprises while Bruce was gone/dead. He gets what's coming to him in the end; "Didn't you get the memo?" Great stuff. Rutger is also known for playing a villain in Blade Runner. Recently he hasn't played many high profile roles besides the occasional guest start on TV shows. More info on his early life thanks to Wikipedia . His films IMDB . The man even has his own website ! Neat did you know facts about Rutger. His first and last name both end with er! -Got his st...

Comment Reply - Protestants

So I've been called out. I had my first comment yesterday stating that during their fight for independence in the Netherlands, Protestants were under oppression in England. I love reading about history but am no History major myself or professional so I appriciate the comment. I remember that happening but I focus on items that interest me. Which is why I've focused on the Netherlands area. So I guess I'll go into it a little more. The Netherlands have always been a very open and free society to live. Think Amsterdam today. In a way I guess you could compare it to Las Vegas or New Orleans. So I have no doubt that some Protestants moved to the Netherlands to escape the oppression and help fuel the independence. People or all walks of life, races, and religions were welcomed. This accepting attitude helped to fuel the competition between England and the Dutch in the 17 and 18th centuries as they raced to gain a trade monopoly over each other. This ties in nice with why I'...